跳到主要內容區塊
跳到主要內容區塊
載入中

資料處理中

How to improve road repair efficiency through fast, low-carbon, and durable maintenance methods,under Extreme Climate Conditions

Historically, traditional pavement M&R approaches have struggled to balance operational efficiency with long-term performance. Conventional pothole fixing using cold-mix asphalt mixture is a fast process, but yields poor durability and subpar surface smoothness. Conversely, preventive maintenance techniques like hot-mix patching and slurry seals offer good durability, but they are costlier, more labor-intensive, and require longer construction times. Because pavement M&R routine is a continuous necessity, these inefficiencies contribute heavily to cumulative carbon emissions, making the reduction of CO2 a critical priority under concerns of climate change.  

Research Background

1. Climate Change and Carbon Emission Challenges

  • Pavement maintenance is a continuous and high-frequency activity, contributing significantly to cumulative carbon emissions.
  • Reducing CO₂ emissions has become a critical issue under global climate change.

2.Increasing Pavement Deterioration and Potholes

  • Conventional maintenance and rehabilitation methods are ineffective in preventing recurrence.
  • Pothole occurrence continues to increase in THB highways.

3. Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R)

  • Conventional M&R: FAST, but poor in quality and durability.
  • Preventive maintenance: DURABLE, but costly and less efficient.

4. Sustainability and Resource Constraints

  • With increasing pothole occurrences and limited resources, a low-carbon technique to fix potholes has become a key challenge.  

坑洞數量.jpgPicture1  Potholes from 2023 to 2025


 Over 10 Years of Development and Achievements

研究流年圖.jpgPicture2   Research Timeline


Highlighted Publications

Table1  Article Publication Compilation

No.TitleJournal / Conference
1Application of Asphalt Concrete Brick in Road Engineering2014 Highway Bureau Research Project Report
2Laboratory evaluation of asphalt concrete bricks containing basic oxygen furnaces2019 IRF Global R2T Conference & Exhibition
3Performance Evaluation of Asphalt Concrete Bricks2020 Taiwan Highway Engineering, Vol. 46, No. 9.
4Development of installing asphalt concrete bricks in conjunction with automatic pothole fixer2022 IRF Global R2T Conference & Exhibition
5Analyzing the Benefits of Improving Sustainability in Provincial Highways through Preventive Maintenance Techniques2024 ICHE International Conference
6Comprehensive Advancement of Asphalt Concrete Brick Technology for Sustainable and Efficient Pavement RepairREAAA Conference 2025
7Application of RFID Technology in Quality Management of Cement Concrete and Asphalt Concrete Testing and InspectionREAAA Conference 2025


期刊發表(圖).jpgPicture3  Photos of Research Presentation


Asphalt Concrete Brick Production Process

The production of Asphalt Concrete Brick (ACB) begins with a flexible mix design that utilizes the original pavement material to ensure optimal bonding and strength. In Step 1, the heated asphalt mixture is placed into a mold and manually compacted 25 times. The process then transitions to a fully automated, one-click system for large-scale production; the testing machine performs the first-side compression (Step 2), automatically flips the specimen (Step 3), and executes the second-side compression to ensure uniform density (Step 4). Finally, after a proper curing period, the finished ACBs are demolded and removed (Step 5).The development of automated ACB production system was also employed to mass producing standard ACB for the needs of field implementation.

瀝青磚製作過程.jpgPicture4  Asphalt Concrete Brick Production Process chart

Key Advantages Of Asphalt Concrete Brick

Analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of existing pothole repair methods, an innovative low-carbon method for asphalt concrete brick repair is proposed, which achieves the advantages of various methods and improves repair effectiveness.

瀝青磚優點.jpgPicture5  Key Advantages of Asphalt Concrete Bricks

ACB came out of the automated ACB production system was compared with those produced by the regular Marshall compactor.  

Evaluation of different ACB production specimens using the Hamburg wheel tracking test to determine the optimal production method.

自動化與馬歇爾比較表.jpgPicture6  Comparison: Automated System vs. Marshall Compactor

Conventional Manual Coring and Patching

took longer time (13-min) and labor intensive (up to 3 personnel) for manual coring and repair tasks, even with ACB.  Consequently, leveling bonding materials and automated coring asset were suggested to investigate.


傳統修補流程圖.jpgPicture6  Workflow of Conventional Manual Coring and Patching

Vehicle-Mounted and Automation Coring Equipment 

It was developed firstly in 2022 and later unveiled the advanced edition in 2025.  It improves limitations of the manual coring process and enables automation of coring and cleaning process before ACB installation .

Conventional methods of manual milling, core drilling, and pavement patching require substantial time and labor. The development of vehicle-mounted automated coring equipment integrates both automated milling and coring functionalities into a single mobile platform. Consequently, this significantly minimizes labor and time costs while enhancing the precision of asphalt pavement rehabilitation.

車載式銑刨機.jpgPicture7 Workflow of Vehicle-Mounted and Automation Coring Equipment 

ACB Leveling with Improved Bonding Materials

Were assessed to speed up the installation process of ACB in the field.  It reduced 1/3 of operation time and labor in comparison with the first generation of manual operation.

黏結材料.jpgPicture 8  Installation process of ACBTHB evaluated the cases study concerning durability of M&R tasks, since 2024. 

lCase study: Pilot field study on provincial highways with long-term performance tracking.

lTo ensure a fair evaluation, the performance comparison of the four repair methods (Pothole fixing with cold-mix, Slurry Seal, Hot-Mix Patching, ACB Technology) is based on a standardized patch size of 0.3 meters × 0.3 meters.

Table 2  Comparative Durability Analysis of Four Pavement Maintenance Options

修補方式比較表.jpg